Land Use

City brings in only a portion of what the market demands for sought-after lakefront boathouses

By Matt Davis, The Lens staff writer |

Watch a version of this story by our news partners at FOX8 News.

How much would you pay to rent a 1,000-square-foot boathouse on Lake Pontchartrain?

Click the headphones to hear Matt Davis talk about how The Lens got this story

Does $1,200 a month sound reasonable? Try $200 a month.

That’s the average monthly rent the City of New Orleans is charging those who lease the 130 boathouses at the Municipal Yacht Harbor. And instead of taxpayers benefiting from the prime lakefront real estate, private tenants have walked away with almost $13 million over the past 15 years, selling 75 of the generous leases on the private market, records show.

Meanwhile the city has pocketed only 3 percent from each of those sales. In fact, the city has made only $3 million in these transfer fees and rent on the sold properties since 1996.

But that’s not the only money the city’s losing out on.

The 130 city-owned boathouses line the edges of the Municipal Yach Harbor, shown in this aerial image from Google Maps.

Under terms of the lease, tenants are forbidden from subletting their boathouses unless they get written permission from the harbor and pay 10 percent of the rental fee to the city.  Despite the many boathouse rentals listed online, the harbor provided no records of such permission ever being granted, and the general manager said nobody has collected those fees. So tenants are effectively free to rent their properties for fair-market value and pocket all of the proceeds.

“This is something that the administration has said repeatedly, that New Orleans has given away too much for too long,” said Councilwoman Susan Guidry, who represents the area.

And the council is all too aware of the lease sales, because until last year, it had to approve every one of them with a vote.

Guidry said Mayor Mitch Landrieu is considering renegotiating the leases, nearly all of which run to 2030.

“I think that there is some willingness among the boathouse tenants to look into this,” Guidry said. “They’re in limbo, it creates uncertainty, not knowing what might happen with the lease, and I think that the boathouse owners realize that.”

The city fully intends to address the situation, said Mike Sherman, Landrieu’s director of intergovernmental relations.

“The Municipal Yacht Harbor is an important City asset, and we are committed to the revitalization of our property at West End,” he wrote in a prepared statement. “As we have demonstrated in our first 11 months in office, we are committed to making sure the citizens of New Orleans receive fair market value for all public assets and that all transactions of those assets are open and fair.”

Right now, it’s hardly an ideal arrangement, said one good-government advocate.

“Setting aside the question of whether government should be in this business in the first place, this harbor situation appears to be a cautionary tale about the risks that governments take when they fashion inflexible, long term commitments in the private market with questionable benefits for the broader public interest,” said Robert Travis Scott, president of the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana.

Over the next 19 years, the city stands to earn $6 million in rent from the boathouses at current rates. But if it raised rents to market rate – say, $1,200 a month –  it could earn $35 million. In other words, if nothing changes, New Orleans taxpayers could miss out on a further $29 million in rental revenue.


The Municipal Yacht Harbor has been in city hands since the state gave New Orleans a “right of administration” over the property in 1906. The boathouses were added in the 1950s. Though it is possible to join a waiting list for one of the 150 open boat slips at the harbor, no such thing exists for the boathouse leases.

“There’s no waiting list because they sell them,” said Municipal Yacht Harbor office manager and accountant Wayne Bloom.

As a result, boathouse leases have proved lucrative over recent years, particularly during the turn-of-the-millenium real estate boom.

Simple boat slips rent from $525 a year for a yacht named Malaria to $1,450 a year for one named Sweet Caroline, records show. But the leases on boathouses have done much less to keep up with inflation.

Take boathouse 38, for example. Records show that its lease changed hands for $45,000 in 1998. It sold again for $139,000 in 2004, and again for $160,000 in 2010. Over the 12 years, taxpayers collected just $10,000 in transfer fees, and $24,000 in rent on the property.

Or there is boathouse 55, which sold to a limited liability company for $159,000 in 2003, and is now available to private renters for $1,200 a month on a real-estate website.

“Enjoy living overlooking Lake Pontchartrain where you can watch the sailboats and the sun set,” reads the website. “Recently renovated with a new kitchen that opens to the great room. Large deck overlooking the lake.”

The city collected just $5,000 in transfer fees on the 2003 lease sale, and even now, collects the standard city rent on the property of around $2,400-a-year.


Records of those buying or selling boathouse leases span New Orleans’ great and good. The Lens filed a public-records request for all lease records related to the boathouses, but the city did not provide any information on how the leases were originally obtained. The Lens only obtained records showing the most recent few leases on the boathouses:

• Former St. Bernard Parish Councilman Joseph S. DiFitta Jr. sold boathouse 78 for $325,000 in September 2004. Records supplied by the harbor do not show when DiFatta acquired the boathouse lease or from whom. DiFatta not respond to inquiries.

• Garbage magnate Sidney Torres IV, owner of SDT Waste and Disposal which serves the French Quarter, sold boathouse 47 for $325,000 in 2003.

“I bought it from this Gretna lady whose husband had it and had passed away, and I was introduced to her by another boathouse owner out there,” Torres said. “It wasn’t for sale, but they said that she might sell it, so I approached her.”

Torres paid $125,000 for the property in 2002, he said, adding $100,000 in renovations before selling the property a year later for a $100,000 profit.

“I only slept there maybe one or two nights out of the year that I had it, and I decided I really wanted to own something in the Caribbean, in the Bahamas. It was too close to home and I didn’t use it, so I sold it,” Torres said.

Torres said he paid sales tax on the property as well as the 3 percent transfer fee to the city.

“I don’t remember the lease being steep for having a place on the water,” Torres said, although the harbor could be noisy on weekends, he added.

Since then, Torres has bought a 20-acre vacation home in the Bahamas, he said.

• Late Popeyes Chicken & Biscuits founder Al Copeland sold boathouse 57 for $350,000 in 2004. He died in 2008.

• The Hotel Monteleone sold boathouse 84 for $100,000 in 2003.  The hotel did not respond to inquiries, and records turned over by the harbor do not show how the hotel came to own the property in the first place.


Meanwhile, taxpayers are missing out, and the City Council has hardly been keen to improve the situation.

In 2006 the council approved an ordinance by former Councilman Jay Batt to make leases even more favorable, extending them by to up to 60 years while increasing the base rental rate of $1,680 a year by just 15 percent every five years.

Previously, rents were set to rise 15 percent every five years from 1995 until 2010, and then 25 percent in 2014 and 2019, The Times-Picayune reported. But Batt’s ordinance removed the 25 percent increases. Batt told the newspaper that the ordinance was designed to encourage rebuilding of the waterfront homes after Hurricane Katrina.

That shouldn’t have been a challenge to those leasing the boathouses, though, because the agreement with the city requires them to carry full replacement value insurance on the property.

The Lens could find no boathouse leases extending beyond 2030, but at least one boathouse owner thinks Batt’s 60-year leases are imminent:

“BOATHOUSE HAS A FABULOUS VIEW OF LAKE,” reads a real-estate website advertising boathouse four for sale. “60 YR. LEASE WAITING TO BE SIGNED BY MAYOR.”

Guidry, who now occupies Batt’s former council seat, said the extended 60-year leases were never signed by former mayor Ray Nagin.

With leases running until 2030, Guidry said it is still possible that leases could be raised before then.

“But we do need to respect the legality of the current leases,” she said.

Guidry was told by the harbor that nobody has sublet their boathouse since Katrina, even though properties are currently being offered online for subletting.

“That’s possibly something, that, enforcement-wise, we need to look into,” Guidry said.


Landrieu identified the yacht harbor in August as one of his top 100 recovery projects slated to receive a portion of $640 million in Hurricane Katrina recovery dollars, but the harbor is still searching for an executive director and remains in apparent organizational disarray.

On a recent afternoon, the canvas awning on the harbor clubhouse was torn and hanging down. Some of the 130 boathouses remained gutted following the hurricane. But most have been restored and stand proud with fresh paint and names like Big Time, Easy Street and perhaps more unsettlingly, Conspiracy.

The agency is audited as part of the city’s regular audit by the State Legislative Auditor’s office, but that report notes: “The Municipal Yacht Harbor Management Corporation does not prepare complete financial statements.”

Financial accountability for taxpayers is achieved because the city has a voting majority of the harbor’s board, the report notes. It also points out that the harbor is expected to “place an emphasis on generating a sufficient amount of net operating revenues to be used for maintenance and capital improvement projects.”

Inspector General Ed Quatrevaux has slated the harbor for investigation in his strategic plan for 2012-2014, along with other satellite agencies of the city in his jurisdiction such as the New Orleans Aviation Board, the Audubon Commission, the French Market, the Lower Pontalba Apartments and the Public Belt Railroad.

From a landlord’s point of view, the rents charged by the yacht harbor do not compare favorably with those of the Orleans Levee District, less than a mile away. A boat shed lease is for sale at $60,000 on nearby Roadway Drive, for example, with a $10,000 annual lease payable to the levee district — four times that payable to the yacht harbor for a boathouse.

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • David Bailey

    Now I can see why the City of New Orleans is broke. Here, we have a valuable asset being used by the “rich” for their private gain. Shame !!!

  • Richard Ganucheau

    The lease amounts stated are low by about 30%,a regular tactic used to encite opponents.The rents charged by the former Levee Board have driven some tennants out of boathouses. On west roadway many of the boathouses are abandoned,and those for sale are getting no offers.The boathouse area has been neglected by the city since Katrina.Only now is the city ,thru the Yacht Harbor Mgt. Board,doing anything to maintain and improve the area.In the last 5 years,anything done to improve that area was done by boathouse lessees,at their expense.

  • stephen broussard

    Every boathouse owner pays property taxes to the city

  • Jane

    Sounds like the same kind of rich elite insider trading that goes on with property taxes and assessment. Landrieu is part of that bunch and probably doesn’t want to rock the boat much.

  • SRD

    The city has proven itself unable to manage its property. 5 years after Katrina and the municpal yacht harbor (which is actually revenue generating) has yet to be repaired. West End is an anchor for Lakeview, Lake Vista (and Bucktown). Can you imagine West Lakeview recovering with the boathouses abandoned and unrepaired since Katrina? Those people willing to pay 300 s/f for a LEASE (avg. 300k) which in theory can be cancelled in 20 years (they all expire in 2030) (essentially 25k a yr) + property taxes of 4k per year + rent to the city at 400/mo + upfront transfer fees of 3 percent to the city — all relying on the good faith of the City of extending the leases and rewarding their investment — should be THANKED, not scourned!!! Take a drive out to West End today and look at all the boathouses for sale or yet unrepaired due to these costs!! If the properties were priced so below market why do they remain on the market for YEARS! This “article” reads like someone is trying to burnish credentials in “investigative journalism” by creating a cause/controvery where none exists. Email me privately and I will give you some much more worthy subjects for your attention. The city should make these transfers EASIER, not more onerous or expensive. Only then will the city see the reinvestment which will return West End to a once thriving neighborhood with bars, restaurants, property taxes, more boating recreation. Assuming she wasn’t quoted out of commerce, Susan Guidry should be ashamed of giving credence to these claims.

  • Jeff

    Great reporting, as usual, Matt! I’m curious about the management and, ultimately, the fate of West End more generally. I know the RPC did a redevelopment study a few years ago, but West End seems to be a squandered redevelopment opportunity. I don’t think there is anything illegal or even distasteful going on there, I just think that the City is simply neglecting an asset, particularly given the dire straights of Coconut Beach and what seems to be a desirable location. I know there are insurance hurdles, but I wonder why nothing has happened out there since the storm. Just some questions…

  • pat

    What’s the beef here? The owners are still paying a mortgage, maintaining their property, and (apparently) paying property tax. The lease is equivalent to a condo fee of $200/month, which is not cheap!

    Do you really have nothing else to “investigate”? This report is a real stretch.

    PS, I have no property or know anyone regarding the boathouses. I just know shoddy journalism when I see it.

  • Jackie

    I’m confused by all of this. I have been looking at camps to buy in the West End for the past year and everything listed had an outrageous land lease of between $12,000 and $25,000 PER YEAR to the levee board. This is on top of your mortgage, taxes, and insurance – not to mention all the time and money spent to fix up a property where you don’t own the land under it and could be taken away from you. Why are these leases so expensive? Who in their right mind would pay that? And why won’t the city lower the leases and reinvigorate one of the few areas in the city with access to the lake?

  • Since there is nothing sexy about the truth it often gets overlooked. For example, I paid a $7,500 lease transfer fee to the city when I acquired my lease for a slab where a boathouse used to be prior to Katrina. I then pay the city $300 per month for the right to construct, with my own money, a building over the city’s lake bottom. Add to that the $3,000 plus in annual property tax to the city, $6,000+ in fire insurance $3,000+ in flood insurance. The city invests $0 in expense of any kind. Help me understand how is that a bad deal for the city? When I eventually sell the leasehold improvement the city gets another 3% of the sale plus continued rent, propert tax, etc.. Also, the rent increases by 5% each year. I think many people hear $200 to $300 per month figure but they think the house is included that price. Not even close. I appreciate investigative journalism, however the whole story would be helpful – even if it is not as sexy nor attention-getting.

    ⬇ Drag and drop your images here to upload them.