Schools
 

Judge takes dim view of election banners on campuses, but they stay for now

Orleans Parish School Board employees  can’t hang any more signs from board property urging people to vote on an upcoming tax measure to benefit schools, but neither do they have to take down existing signs, a judge ruled Tuesday.

The signs don’t explicitly ask people to vote for the measure, but Orleans Parish Civil District Judge Tiffany Chase noted they’re all smiling and holding their thumbs up.

The banners tell people to “Vote Dec. 6” and say that the millage is “Not a tax increase.”

One of the signs in question hangs near the busy intersection of South Carrollton Avenue and St. Charles Avenue, in front of what most recently was a campus of Audubon elementary

Marta Jewson / The Lens

One of the signs in question hangs near the busy intersection of South Carrollton Avenue and St. Charles Avenue, in front of what most recently was a campus of Audubon elementary

Orleans Parish School Board attorney Bill Aaron said those signs would remain in place at least until another hearing can be held Monday. Today’s narrow action was a hearing on granting a temporary restraining order against more going up, part of a lawsuit filed by attorney Willie Zanders. He said he is representing an organization called Justice and Beyond, as well as a coalition of others, including religious, community, labor, civil-rights and youth organizations.

He was also hoping to get the existing signs taken down.

At question is who controls the buildings where the signs are hanging, and whether that is a use of public funds to advocate on behalf of an issue. Public agencies are permitted to run educational campaigns about such ballot measures, but they can’t encourage or discourage a position. Charter schools are public entities.

Driving down South Carrollton Avenue on Monday, banners could be seen hanging on Esperanza Charter School’s fence, and in front of the old Carrollton Courthouse, owned by the School Board and used recently by Audubon elementary.

No one in court could say how many signs are hanging on school properties across the city, though references were also made to banners at Pierre Capdau Elementary and Harriet Tubman Charter School.

Zanders stressed the matter’s urgency despite it being a holiday week.

“People are voting now,” Zanders said.

Early voting for the Dec. 6 election opened Nov. 22 and runs through Saturday.

The tax in question would rededicate money now used to pay down bond debt to a new fund specifically for school facility upkeep. The tax has drawn some unlikely opponents — School Board members — because it will transfer a portion of the funds to the Recovery School District.

In many cases the RSD controls buildings owned by School Board. This further complicated the case Tuesday as Chase sought to determine just who was in charge of hanging up these banners.

“What we need to do is figure out who has control,” Chase said, readily admitting she did not know who controlled the buildings.

The School Board is named in the suit along with interim Superintendent Stan Smith. But the RSD also oversees charter schools occupying dozens of Orleans Parish owned facilities. For instance, Esperanza Charter with a banner is an RSD charter overseen by the Choice Foundation board.

A disclosure on the banners say they were paid for by the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools and that no public money was spent in producing them. Attorney Lee Reid is representing the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools and its Executive Director Caroline Roemer Shirley, both named as defendants in the suit.

Reid said the association hasn’t put any signs on public buildings, and the judge agreed that the association’s involvement is not an issue.

“They can pay for the banners,” Chase said. “That is their constitutional right.”

Attorneys met privately with the judge in her chambers for an hour before the judge issued the temporary restraining order.

In the hallway outside the courtroom after the ruling was issued, Zanders said he will be adding individual charter schools and likely Recovery School District Superintendent Patrick Dobard to the lawsuit. He also said the charter school association will be providing him with the names of schools that requested banners.

Also at question is whether the schools with signs are polling places. That would be illegal, Chase said, but that issue was not addressed in the ruling.

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • nickelndime

    “Justice is blind.” Too bad the same cannot be said of the sorry lot of judges (with limited vision and/or dim views), whom we get stuck with in this city. These judges are beholdin’ to the powerful and wealthy people (certainly not to the general citizenry), and fhese judges hold (out) and they hold (back) because thst’s how they got where they are in the first place. It’s not so hard to say, “Take the signs down, and take them down now!” Lee C. Reid, Esq. of Adams and Reese, LLP – follow the money trail all the way from New Orleans to Baton Rouge and then some (USDOE, IRS) – Law partner in former state superintendent of education, Paul G. Pastorek’s former law firm. It’s not Lee’s ability (other attorneys match or exceed). It’s the damn dirty politics, money, and connections in a corrupt city and a corrupt state. You (collectively speakkng) would swear thaf Lee is a fly on the wall (almost invisible – with the kind of information that he becomes privy to) – even when it comes to the inner workings of the OPSB! It’s like insider trading, and that’s illegal. Lee’s affiliations with Caroline Roemer Shirley’s LAPCS; Riedlinger’s Eastbank Charter Collaborative; Lycée, Einstein (there are so many)…Don’t stop, Willie. So, fill me in very quickly, how can Caroline say fhat Lee is not being paid with public money from her 501(c)(3), and how many of his billable hours are pro bono? These signs should not be on public school buildings – RSD controls leases, but these CMO (charter operators) are out of control. 11/27/2014 11:13 PM

  • nickelndime

    Judge Tiffany Chase could have – should have – figured this out for herself. What! – does she need a law book (with highlighted passages) to fall on her head? The damage has already been done. The public should NOT have seen those signs because they never should have been hung on public school premises in the first place. Bill Aaron, Esq. for the OPSB admitted it. Lee Reid, Esq. of Adams and Reese, LLP (Pastorek, etc.), who represents plaintiff(s) Caroline Roemer Shirley’s LAPCS, et al., will not admit it. There is a hearing later this week. Lawsuits cost money, and not like the public money that Reid has access to. OPSB should ensure that Reid does not sit in (become privy) to the inner workings of its legal department. Other attorneys should complain – why should Reid be on the inside track? That’s why he appears so knowledgeable. Does he wear some kind of “press” badge or something? 12/01/2014 12:22 PM