Schools
 

Contrary to critics’ claims, administrative staffing at OPSB has dropped along with enrollment

Ben Kleban, head of New Orleans College Preparatory Academies, doesn’t understand why the Orleans Parish School Board has a central office staff nine times larger than his own, but just twice as many students in schools it directly oversees.

“I don’t believe the central office staffing has come down even a fraction of what it should have” after Hurricane Katrina, Kleban told Orleans Parish School Board members at their August meeting, just before they approved a $44 million operating budget.

Actually, it has. With enrollment down 81 percent in schools that answer to the Orleans Parish School Board, central office staffing is down 90 percent. And even though enrollment has dropped, school officials point out that they still are responsible for some administrative issues applicable to all parish public schools — chartered or direct-run — and even private schools.

In August the Orleans Parish School Board sold two former administration buildings at its headquarters in Algiers. Before Katrina, these two buildings housed about 440 of the district's 750 central office employees. Today, about 75 school board employees use just a portion of a smaller building.

Jessica Williams / The Lens

In August the Orleans Parish School Board sold two former administration buildings at its headquarters in Algiers. Before Katrina, these two buildings housed about 440 of the district's 750 central office employees. Today, about 75 school board employees use just a portion of a smaller building.

Whether the parish school board’s administrative staff remains top-heavy eight years after Hurricane Katrina — especially now that it educates only a small portion of city students — is a topic of continuing debate. Some board-watchers believe the district could trim operations and costs. They question the number of staff needed to perform tasks that charters contend they could do for less.

The skepticism is echoed by national charter school proponents, who argue that bureaucracy in traditional school districts stymies creativity and can slow funding to classrooms that need it.

Kleban, reflecting on his statement a month later, acknowledged that the school board office has more responsibilities than his charter network does, among them collecting and disbursing taxes  for all schools in the district.

But he wondered if the additional tasks justify a central office as big as the parish school board maintains. A simple budgeting change could better illustrate what it is that they do, Kleban said.

“They are arguing that ‘we do more things,’ and I’m arguing that it can’t possibly be that many more things, and they need to have a better explanation of what those things are,” he said.

How things have changed since Katrina

Before Katrina and the Recovery School District’s takeover of failing schools, the Orleans Parish School Board governed nearly 65,000 students in almost 130 schools. It was the largest district in the state. They did it with a central office staff of about 750, including close to 90 supervisors, administrators or directors, nearly 50 administrative specialists, and a host of maintenance employees.

These days, the district directly runs six schools and oversees 14 charters, for a total enrollment of less than 13,000. Though a charter school’s administrators handle most management issues, for federal funding purposes they are considered part of the parish school board. The board handles federal grant compliance on their behalf.

Today’s central office staff totals 75. That’s a staff decrease of 90 percent. Enrollment, meanwhile, has dropped 81 percent overall — 95 percent when you count just the non-chartered schools run directly by the school board.

Most of the pre-Katrina positions have been eliminated or transferred to the budgetary authority of specific schools they serve, interim Chief Financial Officer Wayne DeLarge said. The school board no longer employs an in-house maintenance team; that work is contracted out.

In all, OPSB employs one central office staffer for every 167 students, counting charters, direct-run schools and the city’s Youth Study Center. The ratio tightens when counting only direct-run schools, as Kleban does – a central office bureaucrat for every 41 students.

The slightly larger Iberia Parish School Board has a 1:165 bureaucrat-to-student ratio, with 85 administrators for 14,050 students. The Franklin Parish School Board, with an enrollment comparable to that of schools run directly by the Orleans Parish School Board, has a 1:66 staff-to-student ratio.

Cathy Mincberg, who heads the nonprofit Center for Reform of School Systems and trained the Orleans school board on best practices during an April retreat, said she’s not aware of any guidelines for an appropriate central office size based on enrollment.

For Orleans Parish “it’s a tough question,” she wrote in an email, because the school system hopes to add more schools in the coming years.

Comparing a charter district to a traditional district

Parish school board administrators contend that the size of the post-Katrina central office is appropriate considering its responsibilities. Chief Academic Officer Rosalynne Dennis dismissed Kleban’s criticisms, saying he doesn’t understand what it takes to run a traditional school district.

Not only does the school board control how much money comes in to local schools, it also has many responsibilities that charter management organizations don’t, such as handling services for special-needs students in 70-plus private schools in Orleans Parish. OPSB is required by law to provide those services. It also pays for textbooks for private schools.

Moreover, OPSB’s child nutrition department serves its own schools and some RSD charters, DeLarge said. The school board also authorizes and regulates charter schools, and, along with the Recovery School District, is responsible for financing and managing school facilities. It also must handle legacy costs incurred before the post-Katrina shakeup, such as health care benefits for retirees.

DeLarge said he’s working on a presentation for the public that would shed more light on the board’s extra tasks. “In any organization, there’s always room for operational efficiencies,” he said. But that’s an ongoing management function that happens “everywhere, every day.”

Some call for budgeting change

One way to determine if the parish board should trim overhead is to change the way it allocates costs, board-watchers say. When budgeting, the board’s finance team separates central office costs and revenue from school-level costs and revenues. If they were to switch to school-based budgeting — allocating the cost of administrative positions to the schools themselves — it would be easier to see excesses, Kleban said.

OPSB board member Woody Koppel agreed. That sort of budgeting — which would likely require district employees to track time spent on school-specific tasks — would make it possible to bill schools for the work the district does to support them, he said. If a school leader doesn’t need a service that the district provides, “then we need to eliminate it,” Koppel said.

In cases when a central office employee provides a service for a private school, that employee’s time should be tied to the federal funding the parish school board gets to perform those services, Koppel said.

This idea isn’t likely to be popular among central office staff. “They’ve never had to do that before, but in our new landscape, it’s incumbent that you do that,” Koppel said.

Stan Smith, the board’s interim superintendent, said school leaders’ recent calls for streamlining the central office follow several years of stagnant state funding. The city’s schools “are stressed for money right now,” he said.

He called the suggested budgeting change “a possible solution … as long it’s something that’s responsible, and that we don’t spend a lot of money in accounting costs, as compared to what we spend putting in the schools.”

But he said he doesn’t want the call for streamlining to negatively impact valuable services that the school board offers to multiple entities, such its child nutrition program.

“I’d hate to walk away from that just to show that we are reducing our staff or reducing our central office level to match someone else’s.”

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • nickelndime

    Well, here’s one problem that keeps the OPSB central office bloated: There is a CAO who was the Director of Special Education, and she retired, but then she came back (probably the next day) and assumed her old Director position. Then the CFO, who really doesn’t hold the proper credentials as CFO was appointed the Interim Academic Superintendent (oh look, now he is unqualified for 2 positons), but because he does not have the qualifications as an academic superintendent, the Director of Special Education was named the CAO (Chief Academic Officer). Now, there is an Interim CFO and an Interim Special Education (or is that vacant Ha!) – Why ? I don’t know and I don’t care. What we have over there at the central office is a bunch of people who are waiting for their retirement options to kick in, and then, only then, will there be a decrease in the number of people in the central office. Forget about tracking what it is they do every day or what specific services they provide to (a) school/schools, because you won’t find that either. And please, this discussion does not even include the charter school office which is another fiasco and more missteps. Open more charter schools! Open more charter schools! More More More of everything. OMG! Some things just don’t change over there.

  • nickelndime

    Thanks for the spreadsheet! There are a couple of bloaters here: Stan (“they made me be the superintendent – I didn’t ask for it”) Smith, Kathleen (“calling all well-heeled and/or politically-connected individuals or groups who would like to connect politically with others with the purpose of starting new charter schools in the New Orleans area – we can make this work”), and Rosalynne (“Ben just doesn’t understand”) Dennis. And look at the jump in salaries across the board – less people, but at much higher pay. Are these people doing a super job, or what?!! I don’t think so. And from the looks of the pre-Katrina central office, they were not running a school system – they were running a goddamn city!

  • jazz_nola

    I really find it interesting that Ben Kleban head of New Orleans College Prep criticizes the number of central office staff in the Orleans Parish School Board. The New Orleans College Prep Schools don’t report to the Orleans Parish School Board, if fact his schools are under the Recovery School District whose has more six figure salaried administrators than most school districts in the state. Additionally Kleban and no other citizen in the state of Louisiana has ever participated in a Recovery School District budget hearing or even knows how to find a budget for the RSD who oversees his schools. That would seem to be the logical place for Kleban to ask questions.

    More importantly Kleban should be trying to improve his school’s test scores which are far below almost all the Orleans Parish Schools.

    Kleban should be explaining to the public why he did not let the students at Cohen Sr High School use their gymnasium last school year. One of Kleban’s charter school is housed in the Cohen building where hundreds of students from Cohen attended, he controlled the floor where the gym is but refused to allow the Cohen students who are regulated to the first floor to use their own gym.

    If anything Kleban should be asking to placed under the Orleans Parish School Board given his schools poor academic performance.

  • nickelndime

    Ben Kleban is running a bunch of charter schools (charter writer, founder…) post Katrina because he put his time in with New Schools for New Orleans (NSNO) in 2006-2007. NSNO is a favored nonprofit with the State – and with the feds, I might add as well. How did Ben become so astoundingly astute and influential in only a year? Ask Sarah Usdin, sitting OPSB member (major connections outside this city), who is the founder of NSNO but stepped down to take the OPSB seat. So, if Ben is sounding off about the OPSB, you might want to consider “his” source, and that would be the board member who has ways of making her views public without being the one to actually say it. Good boy, Ben.