Government & Politics
 

Council increases transparency with subcontractor ordinance

With little to no fanfare, the New Orleans City Council passed an ordinance today requiring all city contractors to disclose their subcontractors.

Transparency proponents have long advocated for this kind of reform to the contracting system, saying that abuse or waste can hide in undisclosed relationships.

As an example of what can happen without such openness, they point to an incident in which a computer-services subcontractor provided a Hawaiian vacation to then-Mayor Ray Nagin.  Nagin later said he didn’t know about the company’s contractual relationship with the city.

In the spring of 2008 Councilman Arnie Fielkow tried to tinker with city’s procedures for granting professional services contracts. The seven-member council’s unanimous support disintegrated into a racially charged discussion that left the measure fatally injured. The explosive meeting signaled the death of meaningful contact reform under the Nagin administration.

Fielkow long has been an advocate of reform to the contracting process, and today’s ordinance signaled a step towards a greater understanding of who benefits from these contracts.

The ordinance and amendment passed 5-0, with two members absent for the vote. It requires that each contract include a sworn affidavit listing all subcontractors. These affidavits would be included with the original contract and made available on the city website.  Councilwomen Stacy Head and Cynthia Hedge-Morrell were not present for the vote.

The ordinance applies only to contracts with the city but not joint projects such as those undertaken by Sewerage & Water Board or other state and federally funded projects.

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • sobieski

    “In the spring of 2008 Councilman Arnie Fielkow tried to tinker with city’s procedures for granting professional services contracts.” — Uhhh, this ordinance isn’t *that, right?

    The “transparency” ordinance required the committee handling contract reviews for the mayor meet public records and open meetings and other transparency laws under the state’s sunshine statutes. This is not *that.

    So what has Landrieu done with Nagin’s revised contracting process and when does Fielkow bring that ordinance BACK??? Please ask them.