Criminal Justice

State tells sheriffs to better explain why deputies should get extra state pay

Beginning April 1, Louisiana sheriffs who want the state to kick in an extra $500 a month for their deputies will have to provide a full job description to show that those deputies primarily work in law enforcement or jail security.

That’s not a new rule, but Sheriff Marlin Gusman’s office has submitted an old version of the form to the state. The one he’s been using doesn’t specify exactly how much time is spent on law enforcement.

And some of those deputies may not be eligible for the the supplement. Under state law, the extra pay cannot be provided to Sheriff’s Office employees whose responsibilities are primarily clerical or unrelated to law enforcement.

Former Orleans Parish deputy-turned-whistleblower Bryan Collins has alleged that as many as 51 Sheriff’s Office employees — representing more than $300,000 in annual supplemental pay — received the pay last year even though they weren’t eligible. Among the employees who appear to be ineligible, according to Collins: kitchen staff, maintenance staff and the sheriff’s chief procurement officer.

The current version of the form reads:

“Describe present duties as a full-time deputy sheriff (Show % of time for each duty)”

The Lens reviewed every supplemental pay application available for those Orleans Parish deputies and found that most of the forms didn’t include the part in parentheses. According to state Department of Treasury spokesman Jason Redmond, the Sheriff’s Office was using a version of the form from 2005.

Now the state has told Louisiana sheriffs they need to use the current version.

The Treasury Department this month informed every sheriff’s office in the state that in order to qualify for the Deputy Sheriff’s Supplemental Pay program, applications must include a breakdown of deputies’ job duties, with the percentage of time spent on each one.

“Some parishes are submitting older versions of the DSSP Employment Information form to our office,” First Assistant State Treasurer Ron J. Henson wrote.

Sheriffs must submit monthly reports showing which deputies are eligible for the supplement. “Your office will be contacted if older versions of the form are used” when submitting the April report” Henson wrote.

The Lens’ review also showed that the Sheriff’s Office often used boilerplate language to describe what the deputies do: “care, custody and control of inmates.” That’s true even when Gusman’s office used the correct version of the form.

The state hasn’t said whether that serves as an adequate job description.

In February, Collins asked the Office of State Inspector General and the Louisiana Legislative Auditor to investigate the supplemental pay program in Orleans Parish. State officials told The Lens they could not comment on requests for investigations.

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • nickelndime

    “The State!” “The State!” Who is “The State”? Telling the Sheriffs (the one in New Orleans just won an election 4gawdssake). It doesn’t get any better (or worse, depending on one’s perspective) than this! This is like Hansel threatening to turn Gretel in to The Witch. “The Witch!” “The Witch!” LOL, have fallen off of my (rolling) chair and am rolling on the floor.

  • benelux

    I have no idea what your point is.

  • nickelndime

    STATE TELLS SHERIFFS: (And please notice that STATE instructions are addressed to ALL SHERIFFS – so this is like when INSURANCE COMPANIES cannot singularly advise/drop one client, but must address their concerns to an entire group. (Anybody out there who thinks they are getting fair and honest treatment in Louisiana ($$$) from insurance companies…oh well, that’s a fight for another dog on another day!). This is the POINT. Same ole, same ole. Nothing new. Corruption as usual in a Lousy State. Lousy corruption record. State just wants to cover its A$$ with paperwork so when anyone (e.g., Feds) comes a asking, it (The State) can say it did its job. That’s the POINT.