We are nearing a tipping point — if we haven't already passed the point of no return.
The suit may have lost the spotlight but it still holds attention in the courts – and in politics.
Continued coastal land loss in Louisiana could cost the economy tens of billions dollars a year.
Before the storm, ideas like “conservation” and “holistic planning” were about as Nu Awlins as grilled tofu and kale burgers. But having your home marinate in 5 feet of water can influence your thinking. Now, discussing and acting on water management ideas is as accepted as parking your car on the neutral ground during heavy thunderstorms.
Provisions in federal law and the $20.8 billion court agreement say that most of Louisiana's expected $8 billion influx has to be spent on restoration of environment. That allays long-held fears the big payday would set off a feeding frenzy among politicians for projects unrelated to the coast.
Two other breaks in the levee farther downriver rejected because of lack of sediment.
The levees were reconstructed to shore up insurable property values, not to eliminate the threat to human life.
Damages to natural resources amounted to $8.3 billion of $20.8 billion agreement.
State coastal authority to decide whether to begin work on controversial method for building land.
The mouth of the Mississippi River should be moved north and communities downriver eventually will have to be abandoned if other parts of southeast Louisiana are to have a future into the next century. Those were among the more startling recommendations proposed by the teams of coastal engineering and sustainability experts from around the world.