Inside the News Room
 

Lens asks judge to reconsider his ruling in public-records case against city and mayor

The Lens is seeking a new trial after a Civil District Court judge denied the nonprofit news outlet’s request for the judge to declare that the city routinely ignores public records law.

The Lens filed a lawsuit against the city and Mayor Mitch Landrieu in mid-May alleging the city regularly fails to answer public-records requests on time and in accordance with state law. The lawsuit listed five outstanding requests, four of which were fulfilled after the lawsuit was filed.

But in his June 1 judgment, denying the Lens’ requests, judge Kern Reese relied heavily on his assertion that all five requests had been fulfilled. That simply wasn’t true — the city has yet to fulfill the fifth request.

Based on those inaccuracies, and other procedural concerns, Lens attorney Scott Sternberg requested an amended judgment and new trial in a motion filed June 9.

“Obviously, we’re not satisfied with the initial ruling because it hampers citizens’ access to the city’s public records,” Lens Editor Steve Beatty said. “So we’re asking the judge to reconsider.”

The Lens initially sued asking the judge for three things:

  • To order the city to produce records that The Lens requested weeks or months ago
  • To declare that the city has a pattern of not providing public records in a timely manner
  • To issue an injunction that would prevent city officials from continuing their practice of delayed compliance

The judge denied all three.

Sternberg’s request for a new trial and amended judgment cites the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, which states that a new trial shall be granted “When the verdict or judgment appears clearly contrary to the law and the evidence.”

In Reese’s June 1 ruling he wrote emphatically that state public records law is “NOT hard, fast and definite.”

In The Lens’ new request, Sternberg counters that notion. “Petitioners believe that the law means what it says — that records should be presumed open, and that requestors should not have to file a lawsuit to get the records they seek.”

A hearing has been scheduled for Aug. 14.

“If that doesn’t work out the way we hope, we’ll likely appeal to the Fourth Circuit,” Beatty said.

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • nickelndime

    I would normally sware dat you all (THE LENS) got a Yada T. Magee (since deceased) on your hands, but Kern Reese has way more going for him than what Yada had (Loyola graduate). “nickelndime” and ASP think that Kern actually passed the bar exam himself and can read (not just the highlighted sections that Yada used to rely on). Having said that, go forth, Steve. And this is exactly why “nickelndime” was banned from posting on NOLA.COM, cuz the censor (1 to be exact) did not like what “nickelndime” had to say about Yada. Yadda Yadda Yadda 06/16/2015 1:19 AM DST USA

  • nickelndime

    “nickelndime” shouldn’t, but “if you don’t know me (“nickelndime”) by now, you will never ever know me…”
    Kern done settled the big money case, and he did it New Orleans style.

    J.H.H.C !!!. (What Would Jesus Do ???). Rita, Ryan and Renee want Tom to live – thereby, they can continue to question his competency, but if Tom (who is aging, and aging well) should pass on, then Gayle (and the inner circle) will have hit the ….P O W E R…

    Contrary to popular belief, BLOOD IS NOT THICKER THAN WATER. rock, paper, scissors (money dilutes blood) 06/19/2015 3:00 AM DST USA