Environment
 

Scientists stress need to address uncertainties around sediment diversions

The first report by an expert scientific panel convened to answer questions about using river sediment diversions to rebuild the coast focuses on a central issue:  The inherent uncertainties in these historically unprecedented projects.

The report released Wednesday makes 18 recommendations for the state Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority to consider as it moves forward. The 50-year, $50 billion Master Plan for the Coast features at least a half-dozen large diversions south of New Orleans.

The panel acknowledged the “complexity of the science and engineering” and the lack, to date, of engineered diversions big enough to use as models. In the panel’s words, the uncertainties are “a highly relevant and pressing topic for consideration.”

“Addressing uncertainty in impact assessments and building uncertainty into model outcomes is necessary not only for determining the potential effectiveness of diversions, but also for developing operational strategies and managing expectations in the future,” the report said.

The panel also stressed the state’s need to do research that will reliably anticipate impacts on the environment as well as on “management endpoints” — a reference to the fishing industry.

The most vocal opposition to diversions has come from fishers concerned that rerouted river water will reduce salinity near the outflow of diversions and relocate their target species. Some researchers also have raised questions about the land-building ability of the diversions — whether it’s enough to outpace sea-level rise and subsidence in the area.

The panel met for the first time last month and heard from a wide range of state and federal agencies and environmental groups as well as diversion opponents.

Its next meeting is April 30 at the Lindy C. Boggs International Conference Center in New Orleans.

Recommendations for addressing the uncertainties are categorized by varying time frames, such near-term, long-term, as well as whether they are ongoing or project-specific. The recommendations fall into six general areas:

Help us report this story     Report an error    
The Lens' donors and partners may be mentioned or have a stake in the stories we cover.
  • Ben Taylor

    To try to repair and maintain the Mississippi River delta we’ll
    have to restore the processes that built it in the first place. This was originally
    done by nature, not the federal government. Heck, the government is largely responsible
    for the mess we’re in.

    The natural processes of the delta are uncompromising and
    obeying them means it won’t always be possible to create “boutique”
    environments to suit every “user group.” Historically, fishermen had to go
    where the fish were, not the other way around.