<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effectiveness of BP training may be lost in translation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelensnola.org/2010/05/12/lost-in-translation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelensnola.org/2010/05/12/lost-in-translation/</link>
	<description>Investigative Journalism from New Orleans and the Gulf Coast States</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:18:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Charles Mock</title>
		<link>http://thelensnola.org/2010/05/12/lost-in-translation/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Charles Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelensnola.org/?p=4761#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like a breakdown in communication from the very beginning. I don&#039;t know how anyone can misunderstand whether one will be paid for the training or not. What part of that communication would anyone not understand? Either one is a paid contractor which implies &quot;training&quot; or, a volunteer willing to be trained with an understanding that you might not be hired, therefore  your training will have been in vain--no paycheck. I just don&#039;t get it. Is this not a duplication of the &quot;who&#039;s to blame&quot; fiasco going on regarding the oil spill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like a breakdown in communication from the very beginning. I don&#8217;t know how anyone can misunderstand whether one will be paid for the training or not. What part of that communication would anyone not understand? Either one is a paid contractor which implies &#8220;training&#8221; or, a volunteer willing to be trained with an understanding that you might not be hired, therefore  your training will have been in vain&#8211;no paycheck. I just don&#8217;t get it. Is this not a duplication of the &#8220;who&#8217;s to blame&#8221; fiasco going on regarding the oil spill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

